Last May the American Civil Liberties Union sued Clearview for privacy violations in Illinois, a case that is ongoing. The decision in Canada likely will lend heft to other legal challenges not only to Clearview’s technology but facial recognition in general. The Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia and the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta also took part in the investigation. Authorities also did not buy Clearview’s defense that privacy laws do not apply to its activities because the company has no connection to Canada, and that no consent was required because the photos were publicly available on websites. The company made these same arguments in its case to the Canadian Privacy Commissioner, which the investigation shot down. Moreover, Clearview is not to blame if law enforcement misuses its technology.
One of the biggest arguments in his company’s defense that Ton-Thatand has made in published reports is that there is significant benefit in using its technology in law enforcement and national security, which outweighs privacy concerns of individuals. It also provides access to a smartphone app that allows clients to upload a photo of an unknown person and instantly receive a set of matching photos. Since 2019, the company has come under considerable fire and faced legal challenges to its technology and business practices, part of a larger question of whether facial-recognition technologies being developed by myriad companies-including heavy hitters like Microsoft and IBM- should be legal at all.Ĭlearview to date has amassed a database of billions of these faceprints, which it sells to its clients. “Yet the company continues to claim its purposes were appropriate, citing the requirement under federal privacy law that its business needs be balanced against privacy rights.”Ĭlearview, founded in 2017 by Australian entrepreneur Hoan Ton-Thatand, is in the business of collecting what it calls “faceprints,” which are unique biometric identifiers similar to someone’s fingerprint or DNA profile, from photos people post online. “It is completely unacceptable for millions of people who will never be implicated in any crime to find themselves continually in a police lineup,” Canada’s Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien said in a statement. Moreover, the investigation found that Clearview had collected highly sensitive biometric information without people’s knowledge or consent, and then used and disclosed this personal information for inappropriate purposes that would not be appropriate even if people had consented. Canadian authorities have found that the collection of facial-recognition data by Clearview AI is illegal because it violates federal and provincial privacy laws, representing a win for individuals’ privacy and potentially setting a precedent for other legal challenges to the controversial technology.Ī joint investigation of privacy authorities led by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada came to this conclusion Wednesday, claiming that the New York-based company’s scraping of billions of images of people from across the Internet represented mass surveillance and infringes on the privacy rights of Canadians, according to a release the Office posted online.
0 kommentar(er)
